1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoray [572]
3 years ago
6

School boy - - - - snail True False​

English
1 answer:
gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is violence ever justified essay​
UNO [17]

Answer:

Violence is a central concept for describing social relationships among humans, a concept loaded with ethical and political significance. In some, probably most, circumstances it is evident that violence is unjust; but, some cases appear more debatable to someone’s eyes: can violence ever be justified?

As Self-Defense

The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. If a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence.

It is important to notice that violence may come in different forms, including psychological violence and ​verbal violence. In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified. Thus, for instance, to a punch you may be legitimate to respond with a punch; yet, to mobbing (a form of psychological, verbal violence, and institutional), you are not justified in replying with a punch (a form of physical violence).

In a more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense, violence of any kind may be justified in reply to the violence of any other kind, provided there is a somewhat fair use of the violence exercised in self-defense. Thus, it may even be appropriate to respond to mobbing by using physical violence, provided the violence does not exceed that which seems a fair payoff, sufficient to ensure self-defense.

An even more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense has it that the sole possibility that in the future violence will be perpetrated against you, gives you sufficient reason to exercise violence against the possible offender. While this scenario occurs repeatedly in everyday life, it is certainly the more difficult one to justify: How do you know, after all, that an offense would follow?

Violence and Just War

What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake. Equally, according to some, it may be justifiable to respond with physical violence to some legal or institutional violence. Suppose, for instance, that State S1 imposes an embargo over another State S2 so that inhabitants of the latter will experience tremendous inflation, scarcity of primary goods, and consequent civil depression. While one may argue that S1 did not impart physical violence over S2, it seems that S2 may have some reasons for a physical reaction to S2.

Matters concerning the justification of war have been discussed at length in the history of Western philosophy, and beyond. While some have repeatedly supported a pacifist perspective, other author stressed that on some occasions it is unavoidable to wage wars against some offender.

Idealistic vs. Realistic Ethics

Explanation:

just built diff

7 0
2 years ago
Which of these newspaper headlines employs a figurative sound device?
aliya0001 [1]
C, put your priority on Protein, almost every word starts with P.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the sentence.
Kobotan [32]
I think its agreed/tastes. im kinda stuck between both. but im more of leaning towards agreed :P
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anybody know the theme of the story sorry wrong number.
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer: The theme of the story is to listen to whoever is speaking to you. In Sorry Wrong Number no one listened to Mrs. Stevenson about a murder on loose. She tells the police but they think that she was crazy and was lying.

Explanation: Give me my brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
How is Carl sandburgs poem “fog” typical of his work
olga55 [171]

Answer:

What do you mean by "typical of his work?" :)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the New England Primer and what was it’s purpose?
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence is an example of biased statement?
    12·1 answer
  • Which is NOT an example of a paradox?
    11·1 answer
  • How is the character sod David Petra Idm is a justapostion if melinda
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the statements best describes the function of narrative poetry Narrative poetry describes an experience. Narrative poet
    11·2 answers
  • What does this quote mean " Glowed with barbaric luster"?
    12·1 answer
  • 3. Active and passive are types of verb
    11·2 answers
  • one of the strongest human drives seems to be desire for power. write an essay in which you discuss how a character in a novel o
    8·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=what%20%5C%3A%20is%20%5C%3A%20meaning%5C%3A%20of%20%5C%3A%20photography%20%5C%3A%3F" id="TexFo
    8·1 answer
  • What happens to Miss Brent as she’s sitting alone in the dining room? Describe her behavior immediately before this event and ma
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!