Answer:
Undervalued
Explanation:
The PPP exchange rate is the implicit exchange rate, so that everywhere, one dollar has the same purchasing power. In general, this exchange rate is different from the exchange rate on the market.
Because the same nominal GDP translates to a higher real GDP by using the PPP exchange rate, one Pakistan Rupee must be valued more in terms of U.S. dollars than in contexts of the market exchange rate under the PPP exchange rate. The Pakistan Rupee is therefore worth less than its true value in the economy, i.e., undervalued.
Answer:
Option C.The payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Rupert did the right thing and as well follow the due process and custom of the country because he fills out the license paperwork and as well takes the license paperwork to the correct office in which he pays the front desk person the amount of $100 to process the paperwork while Cordelia on the other hand violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act reason been that due to the connections she had in that country she went ahead to schedules an appointment with the minister in charge of commerce because the minister has the authority to determine the foreign companies that can get licenses and she as well pays the minister the amount of $200 to approve their license.
Therefore based on the scenario we can vividly say that the payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Answer:
1) Equity = 320,000
2) Assets = 260,000
3) Result of operations for the month = 140,000
4) Ending balance of retained earnings = 210,000
Explanation:
1) Equity = Assets – Liabilities = 480,000-160,000 = 320,000
2) Asset = Liabilities + Equity = 100,000 + 160,000 = 260,000
3) Result of operations for the month = monthly revenues - monthly expenses = 365,000-225,000 = 140,000
4) Ending balance of retained earnings = Beginning balance of retained earnings + Net Income (revenue – expenses) – Dividend = 180,000 + 85,000 – 35,000 – 20,000 = 210,000
Answer:
when costs are recognized as expenses on the income statement.
Explanation:
The expense recognition principle is an accounting principle which is typically used on accrual basis accounts and it states that expenses incurred by an individual or business entity should be recognized and matched in the same period with respect to the revenues they are related to.
The expense recognition principle indicates when costs are recognized as expenses on the income statement.
For instance, company XYZ purchases a property worth $90,000 in June, it was then sold in July for $250,000. Based on the expense recognition principle, the $90,000 cost shouldn't be recognized by company XYZ as an expense until July, when the related revenue would be recognized also. Else, if recognized, its expenses would be overstated by $90,000 in June, and consequently understated to the tune of $250,000 in July.
Additionally, the expense recognition principle helps business owners to calculate their taxes and profits or losses properly.
The acid test ratio for the firm as on 31st December 2019 will be 0.85 as per the information contained under the balance sheet.
<h3>What is acid-test ratio?</h3>
The ratio, which is derived by the division of the current assets less inventories with the current liabilities of the firm, is known as the acid-test or quick ratio.
Using the formula and given information, the acid-test ratio will be computed as,
Hence, the acid-test ratio is as computed above.
Learn more about acid-test ratio here:
brainly.com/question/17251234
#SPJ1
