Answer:
The correct answer is: <u>Is it balanced?</u>
Explanation:
This question based on ethics would be the most appropriate to assess these situations. Because when you confront your friend that it would not be fair and ethical for him to share an article written by him to be used as if you had written it, he responds to you with behavior that you consider unethical, but in these situations there is no balance comparison, as they are different situations.
Ethical issues seek to solve conflicting problems and dilemmas.
Answer:
a. No. A state court will do a better job in this case because it exercises unlimited jurisdiction. Moreover, you can only bring your case to a federal court if the amount of your claim is up to $75,000 or the issue is exclusive to the federal court. This is not the case here.
b. Yes and No. We need some additional information about the accident location to help answer this question definitively.
c. No. You should not consider accepting the offered settlement. The jury award is meant to pay for your medical bills and also to help you recover financially as though the accident did not happen in the first place. Accepting any lesser amount after the judgment is rendered is in bad taste. The other party should have negotiated to settle out of court before the final judgment was rendered. But it did not. So, go with the jury award.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Missed work for 15 weeks
Total medical bills incurred = $50,000
Total lost wages incurred = $15,000
Jury award = $100,000 ($50,000 for medical, $15,000 for lost wages and $35,000 for punitive damages)
Settlement offer = $50,000
Explanation:
The Journal Entry is given below:-
a. Cash Dr, 8400
Accounts receivable 8400
(Being the Cash received)
b. Supplies Dr, 2500
Office equipment 2500
(Being the reserve entry is recorded)
Supplies Dr, 2500
Accounts payable 2500
(Being the supply is purchased)
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
any all all my stuff going see week
