1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
15

George is riding his skateboard down the street while listening to music with earbuds in. George does not see Martha, a store ow

ner, who is putting flowers out in front of her store. He looks up just in time and swerves to miss Martha but knocks her flower display down, shattering it to pieces. Is he liable?
Law
1 answer:
erastova [34]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Yes, Martha suffered a compensable loss.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair.
BartSMP [9]

1) The theory of product liability under which Weasley could have sued Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries is strict product liability.

However, the facts do not support such a claim because the negligence of Weasley caused Ginny's injuries. How could a child of six years be left alone in a spa?

<h3>What are the theories of product liability?</h3>

The theories of product liability, which involve injury or damage caused by a defective product, include negligence, breach of contract/warranty, and strict liability.

For strict liability to be imposed on Great Lakes, Weasley must prove that the tort occurred based on Mundungus' irresponsibility.  The question is, was Mundungus responsible for caring for Ginny or her mother?

2) The Privity of contract would not be required in a product liability case against Great Lakes. Since the spa is a product of Great Lakes while Mundungus sold it to Weasley, there is no basis for Great Lakes to deny privity of contract.

<h3>What is the privity of contract?</h3>

Using privity of contract as a basis of defense means that only parties to a contract have right to sue and be sued so that they can enforce the rights and obligations arising from the contract.

3) The six requirements that Weasley must meet for action in strict product liability against Great Lakes are proving that:

  1. The spa caused Ginny to be injured and not Weasley's negligence.
  2. The spa that injured Ginny was defective.
  3. The defect of the spa caused Ginny's injury.
  4. The defect of the spa made it dangerous for Ginny.
  5. The negligence arose from Great Lakes.
  6. Great Lakes breached the contract warranty.

4) The defenses to product liability that Mundungus or Great Lakes can assert are as follows:

  1. Weasley lacks the locus standi.
  2. No duty of care was owed to Ginny by Mundungus or Great Lakes.
  3. Weasley misused the spa through her negligence.
  4. Weasley must know the riskiness of abandoning Ginny in the spa.

Thus, none of the theories of product liability supports Weasley's case.

Learn more about the theories of product liability at brainly.com/question/17202560

4 0
3 years ago
Do you think the benefits of transitioning from coded talk, specifically 10-codes, to plain language communication outweigh the
Bezzdna [24]
10-codes can be used to law enforcement’s advance in a situation where you don’t have a ear piece, and your lapel mic is where the audio comes out, and dispatch says “Are you 10-12?”, which means are you present with a subject for most agencies. When dispatch says that topically the subject you are with could be a person that you had dispatch run them through NCIC, probably has warrants, or has info that as the officer you don’t want the subject to know that you know. Because you are probably going to have to arrest them in said situation.
4 0
2 years ago
Sabine came from the Czech Republic to the United States to work as an au pair, or so she thought. When she arrived, she was tak
frozen [14]

Answer:

The thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.

Explanation:

Debt Trafficking:

When the human traffickers perform illicit relocation of the women saying them to pay off their debt after starting working at new location in some honorable business, But on their relocation, they force them into the prostitution business to pay their unlawful debt.

Debt Bondage:

It is debt which some labor contractor pays to some person and in return the person willingly delivers his services to pay his debt to the contractor

Debt Peonage:

It is the debt which first person pays to the second person and if the second person remains unsuccessful in paying his debt, the first person forces the second person to work for him at some minimal wage rate. In this way the second person becomes the victim of debt peonage.

After understanding the aforementioned concepts of three different types of debts, we conclude that the thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a general partnership
saveliy_v [14]
“A business organization where all partners are general partners who have unlimited liability and equal management authority”
3 0
3 years ago
What are the three characteristics of criminal law
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

crime has at least three elements: a criminal act, also called actus reus; a criminal intent, also called mens rea; and concurrence of the two.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd<br>ddddddddddd
    5·2 answers
  • My discord is<br><br> #1864<br><br> If anyone wants to friend me
    15·1 answer
  • Hi everyone
    7·1 answer
  • A State A citizen and a State B citizen were in a car accident in State A. The State A citizen filed a negligence action in a St
    10·1 answer
  • The average American credit card debt is about $15000, if you make monthly payments of $350, with annual interest rate 16%, how
    7·1 answer
  • You work as an investigator and you are chasing a fugitive criminal, and you have learned that the criminal uses a boat to escap
    9·1 answer
  • 10. Which of the following is a true statement about the crime of incitement to commit genocide?
    10·1 answer
  • 4. High-risk drivers habitually deviate from driving norms.<br> T or F<br> Need help please
    10·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    8·1 answer
  • Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!