Answer:
Judicial restraint
Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."
Explanation:
Answer:
I think it would be since Americans couldn't pay back their debts, that led to the stock market crash.
Explanation:
Unlike a market economy — in which private citizens and business owners make production decisions — a centrally planned economy controls what is produced and the distribution and use of resources. State-owned enterprises undertake the production of goods and services.
They could do it because they didn't support communism. The Soviet Union incorporated many European states, not just Russia. If they weren't with the party they would probably get removed. Such countries were numerous, including Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Ukraine, and many similar countries. Many of these countries have bad memories about that period and are against the Communists and against the soviet union which is why they would remove the statue of Lenin.
