Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
hope the diagram helps haha
Answer:
sorry i dont understand either!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
She gave away 8 apples because 13 minus 5 is 8
Answer:
No solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Write inequality
3(x - 2) + 1 ≥ x + 2(x + 2)
Step 2: Solve for <em>x</em>
- Distribute: 3x - 6 + 1 ≥ x + 2x + 4
- Combine like terms: 3x - 5 ≥ 3x + 4
- Add 5 to both sides: 3x ≥ 3x + 9
- Subtract 3x on both sides: 0 ≥ 9
Here we see that the statement is false. Therefore, you cannot solve for the inequality.
The <em>second order</em> polynomial that involves the variable <em>x</em> (border inside the rectangle) and associated to the <em>unshaded</em> area is x² - 62 · x + 232 = 0.
<h3>How to derive an expression for the area of an unshaded region of a rectangle</h3>
The area of a rectangle (<em>A</em>), in square inches, is equal to the product of its width (<em>w</em>), in inches, and its height (<em>h</em>), in inches. According to the figure, we have two <em>proportional</em> rectangles and we need to derive an expression that describes the value of the <em>unshaded</em> area.
If we know that <em>A =</em> 648 in², <em>w =</em> 22 - x and <em>h =</em> 40 - x, then the expression is derived below:
<em>A = w · h</em>
(22 - x) · (40 - x) = 648
40 · (22 - x) - x · (22 - x) = 648
880 - 40 · x - 22 · x + x² = 648
x² - 62 · x + 232 = 0
The <em>second order</em> polynomial that involves the variable <em>x</em> (border inside the rectangle) and associated to the <em>unshaded</em> area is x² - 62 · x + 232 = 0. 
To learn more on polynomials, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/11536910