Answer:
updtxuroxutooutduotduoruotoutddutosuorosutzourzoutsouriprzuozripzt7ors
Explanation:
vhhvnbhuvvuviug ug9uvuv9y9v
bvvbbucucicuguverrrrr44eeeee
Probably democracy cause that’s the most fairest out of all the options.
Also chapter 13 of the Apostle Paul's Letter to the Romans, reads, in part: "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God.
Pls give me a brainliest if this helped thx
Answer:
because they were being taxed by Parliament and not by their own government
Explanation:
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
C.)materialism amd corporate greed because that is not an weakness.
