All categories

2 years ago

Simplify 9/12 into simplest form

2 answers:

5 0

We divide both numbers by three bcz both are multiples of three
And by dividing them by three we get:
9……….3
— ➗ —. = 3/4
12……..3

HOPE IT HELPS!!!

Kryger [21]2 years ago

4 0

Both 9 and 12 can be divided by 3.
Divide both 9 and 12 by 3.
9/3=3 12/3=4
9/12=3/4
3/4 is the simplest form of 9/12

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP!! A classmate wrote the set notation for the values of the domain of a function {−5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0} as {x | −5 ≤

vfiekz [6]

<h3>Answer: Choice B</h3>

The set notation includes all values from -5 to 0, but the domain only includes the integer values

eg: something like -1.2 is in the second set, but it is not in the set {-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}

==========================================================

Further explanation:

Let's go through the answer choices one by one

A. This is false because 0 does not come before -5, but instead -5 is listed first. The order -5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0 is correct meaning that $-5 \le x \le 0$ is the correct order as well.
B. This is true. A value like x = -1.2 is in the set $\left\{x| -5 \le x \le 0\right\}$ since -1.2 is between -5 and 0; but -1.2 is not in the set {-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0}. So the distinction is that we're either considering integers only or all real numbers in this interval. To ensure that we only look at integers, the student would have to write $\left\{x| x\in\mathbb{Z}, \ -5 \le x \le 0\right\}$ . The portion $x \in \mathbb{Z}$ means "x is in the set of integers". The Z refers to the German word Zahlen, which translates to "numbers".
C. This is false. The student used the correct inequality signs to indicate x is -5 or larger and also 0 or smaller; basically x is between -5 and 0 inclusive of both endpoints. The "or equal to" portions indicate we are keeping the endpoints and not excluding them.
D. This is false. Writing $-5 \ge x \ge 0$ would not make any sense. This is because that compound inequality breaks down into $-5 \ge x \ \text{ and } \ x \ge 0$ . Try to think of a number that is both smaller than -5 AND also larger than 0. It can't be done. No such number exists.

8 0

2 years ago

Can someone help ?! Please

lisabon 2012 [21]

37 is a prime number

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Given f(x)=8x+13 and g(x)=x^2-5x, find (f-g)x

uysha [10]

(f-g)x= -x²+13x+13

Hope it helps you....

4 0

2 years ago

Victoria spent one-fourth of her birthday money on clothes. She received another $25 a week later. If she has a total of $70 now

tia_tia [17]

Answer:

she had $60 before she went for shopping

Step-by-step explanation:

PLZ MARK BRAINLIEST

Let x represent the amount of money that Victoria had before she went for shopping.

Victoria spent one-fourth or her birthday money on clothes. It means that the amount she spent on shopping is 1/4 × x = x/4. Amount that she was having left would be x - x/4 = 3x/4

She received another 25$ a week later. The amount that she is having at this point will be 3x/4 + 25

If she has a total of 70$ now, it means that

3x/4 + 25 = 70

Multiplying through by 4

3x + 100 = 280

3x ,= 280 - 100 = 180

x = 180/3 = 60

3 0

3 years ago

Solve for a: <br><br> 28,000 / (1+a) = 0

Darya [45]

There is no solution.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers