Answer:
dsjbjfhs fgdgg
Explanation:
dvrhyvrbszhgyzsjfgydssvew rfh xjrsuyg
Answer:
press regulations are rules enforced by the jurisdiction of law. Guidelines for media use differ across the world.[1] This regulation, via law, rules or procedures, can have various goals, for example intervention to protect a stated "public interest", or encouraging competition and an effective media market, or establishing common technical standards
Explanation:
Answer:
I don't know sorry
Explanation:
you scammed me for some of my points if you didn't know don't put "I don't know sorry" let someone else take my points that knows the answer I'm gonna do this on all your unanswered questions and take as much points I can that will teach you not to mess with me
The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
- For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.
This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
