1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anvisha [2.4K]
3 years ago
10

If a group of people survived a plane crash on an uninhabited island, how would they establish order? Who would be in charge?

History
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
7 0
There are many different scenarios of how to establish order but the most efficient way is through a simple democracy. A direct democracy where no in particular is in charge. Everyone has a say or opinion. Putting things up to a vote as a group makes things fair in a way having an individual leader making the decisions wouldn’t. There would be no fights for leadership or too much indecision on any one topic. Voting, expression, and communication through a small simplified version of direct democracy for survival purposes would be most efficient. Plus it would make for a good foundation of trust and teamwork. It is however possible for someone to rise up amongst the rest and lead properly. Its possible but it’d present more cons than pros in the long run.

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Compare life under Stalin's rule rug life under the Russian tsars
In-s [12.5K]
The monarchy lasted for hundreds of years in Russia and Stalin's rule was only thirty, there were many different Tsars, cruel ones, enlightened ones, clever ones, pious ones, stupid ones and despotic ones. So I'll compare Stalin to the monarchies of the last two Tsars, Alexander III and Nicholas II. 

<span>Similarities: </span>
<span>Life was cheap - the Tsar and Stalin thought nothing of having political rivals exiled, Stalin was crueler and had more executed. </span>
<span>The State played the biggest role in industrialisation. Under Alexander and Nicholas the country was beginning to industrialise, but the industrialisation was for iron and steel for railways and guns, textiles for uniforms and coal to fire the furnaces of industry. </span>
<span>For the peasants movement was limited, there was an internal passport system, so people could not simply move around if they fancied it. </span>
<span>Both had enormous secret police organisation. </span>

<span>Differences: </span>
<span>The Monarchy was bound up with the Orthodox church; Stalin, despite training for the priesthood, was an atheist and hostile to the church. </span>
<span>The Monarchy was fabulously wealthy, as were most of the aristocracy; Stalin lived a modest life, he had no palaces, no court jeweller and no crown jewels. </span>
<span>The poor were exceptionally poor under the Tsars, the peasants were mostly subsistence farmers not wealthy farmers. </span>
<span>Education under the Tsars was very poor - just 5% were literate; Education was very good under Stalin 95% literacy. </span>
<span>Most people lived in the countryside under the Tsars' they were urban dwellers under Stalin. </span>
<span>Only the aristocracy could have political influence under the Tsars; only party members could have political influence under Stalin. </span>
<span>Women could not be educated, begin divorce proceedings, stand for political office, have an abortion or had many career opportunities; they could do all these things under Stalin </span>

<span>Both were cruel despotisms, Stalin was crueller, but, for those who did not fall foul of the regime, life was better in many ways under Stalin.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
What happened to the laws and traditions of the Western Roman Empire once it fell?
pantera1 [17]
These traditions were used by many other colonies and empires.

Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Which information best supports the claim that male and female bullfrogs are not similar?
Iteru [2.4K]
Could you provide answer choices or the source being used to answer this?
8 0
3 years ago
How did television change politics? <br><br><br><br> PLZ HELP!
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Everything became more widespread and people could get information alot easier

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
The reign of terror set up revolutionary courts to prosecute
kipiarov [429]
In France following the French Revolution there was a period that is known as the "reign of terror" whereby revolutionary courts were set up to prosecute individuals who were believed to be "enemies of the revolution." This was essentially a witch hunt for the enemies of the political elites during this period. 
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What two things did the Soviet Union do that helped bring about the Sino-Soviet split?
    11·2 answers
  • Passover is related to what event in Jewish history
    8·2 answers
  • What is the legal alternative to marriage in france in which couples receive many of the same legal rights as married couples wi
    7·1 answer
  • Did Jesus repeat basically one message to Nicodemus three times
    14·1 answer
  • How did humanism change the way Europeans thought about the world?
    9·2 answers
  • The purpose of aqueducts was
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a trade commodity for Haiti? O Coffee Sugar sh O Livestock Cotton​
    6·1 answer
  • Please help<br> How did the US became an imperialist power?
    5·2 answers
  • Ngày 10 tháng 10 năm 1945 là ngày gì
    6·1 answer
  • What means did workers use to improve working conditions
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!