<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the rise of the "proletariat," since Marx and his peers were highly against the consolidation of private wealth. </span></span>
<span>Shifts </span>between<span> cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. </span>
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]
It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
The correct answer is A.The Brown case addresses whether the plaintiffs have been afforded the full rights of citizenship.
According to the excerpt all persons that are citizens of the United States should be accorded the rights of citizens without being discriminated against
Athens because it sounds like the Greek Goddess of war, Athena. Athens was the largest city and capital of Greece which also makes it one of the most populated. And English is also widely spoken there so if you ever wanted to visit there it would be easy to adjust to.
