The answer to this is 42 degrees and 138 degrees.
Answer:
7/12.
Step-by-step explanation:
=x/x+5.
x-5/x+5+4=⅛
x-5/x+9=⅛
x-5=⅛(x+9)
x-5=⅛x+1⅛
x-⅛x=1⅛+5
⅞x=49/8
7x=49
x=7
thus the initial fraction is x/x+5= <u>7</u><u>/</u><u>1</u><u>2</u>
A rational number is a fraction
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the selling of the units positive earning and the purchasing of the units negative earning.
<h3>Case-1:</h3>
- Mr. A purchases 4 units of Z and sells 3 units of X and 5 units of Y
- Mr.A earns Rs6000
So, the equation would be

<h3>Case-2:</h3>
- Mr. B purchases 3 units of Y and sells 2 units of X and 1 units of Z
- Mr B neither lose nor gain meaning he has made 0₹
hence,

<h3>Case-3:</h3>
- Mr. C purchases 1 units of X and sells 4 units of Y and 6 units of Z
- Mr.C earns 13000₹
therefore,

Thus our system of equations is

<u>Solving </u><u>the </u><u>system </u><u>of </u><u>equations</u><u>:</u>
we will consider elimination method to solve the system of equations. To do so ,separate the equation in two parts which yields:

Now solve the equation accordingly:

Solving the equation for x and y yields:

plug in the value of x and y into 2x - 3y + z = 0 and simplify to get z. hence,

Therefore,the prices of commodities X,Y,Z are respectively approximately 1477, 1464, 1437
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.