The builder is at fault, however if there is no legal document that he has signed to say that he would complete the work and help them, then he isn’t liable.
<h2>Answer<u>:</u></h2><h2><u>q2345t6y7890987654345678987667876543456787654</u></h2><h2><u>Explanation:</u></h2><h2><u>34567898765434567876543245678765</u></h2>
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
Answer:
le5s come on G00.gle meet as a Friend
ybt-hdbc-hwe
Come now
Trade Act of 1974 granted the president the ability to engage in trade negotiations, Congress limited presidential jurisdiction by requiring a determination that any agreement will not endanger national security and would promote the purposes of the Act.
