Answer:
The correct answer would be option C.
Explanation:
If there is a new co worker hired in my office, and its her beginning days, and I, along with other team members see that she is not as productive as other members of the team are, and we all have to work more and harder to make up for her work. So i would preferably give her advice and tips for how to get things done correctly and efficiently. I would not like to get her out of the office, rather i will try to make her understand the things as soon as possible and give her tips to increase her work efficiency. But if the problem continues, and I believe that she will not be able to cope up with us, then i will talk to the supervisor and suggest him that she might not be the best role for us. But i will go with option C.
None of them is the answer
Answer:
(a) GDP is a dependent variable and aggregate net investment is a independent variable. There is a positive relationship between the variables which means that an increase in the net investment will lead to increase GDP.
(b) There is a negative relationship between the variables which means that as the supply of wheat increases, as a result price of wheat falls. So, as the number of acres of wheat planted in a season increases as a result price of wheat decline.
(c) There is a negative relationship between the variables which means that an increase in the interest rate in an economy will lead to increase the cost of borrowings and hence, net investment falls.
(d) There is a negative relationship between the variables because of the law of demand. It states that an increase in the price of a commodity will lead to reduce the quantity demanded for that commodity.
(e) There is no relationship between these variables. Both the variables are totally uncorrelated.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are not allowed to trade permits is:
total loss = farmer A' loss + farmer B's loss
where:
- farmer A's loss = (100 - 50) x $25 = $1,250
- farmer B's loss = (100 - 50) x $50 = $2,500
total loss = $1,250 + $2,500 = $3,750
2) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are allowed to trade permits is:
Since farmer A will be willing to sell his permits to farmer B for a price that is ≥ $25 and ≤ $50, the total cost of reducing runoff is $2,500.
If farmer A sells his runoff permit at a price higher than $25 his costs will decrease but farmer B's costs will increase, so any gain due to price change is offset by the other farmer's loss.
