Where the choices?........
Part A: B AquAdvantage salmon has DNA from other fish that lets it grow faster and in different conditions than regular Atlantic salmon.
The entire text talks about how these genetically modified salmon could be a better food source if it was approved by the FDA. One of the reasons is because it grows faster and in different conditions so it is easier farm.
Part B: C Paragraph 14
This paragraph supports part A because it specifies that the AquAdvantage salmon can grow to full size in half the time of Atlantic salmon.
3. D The FDA temporarily reversed its approval of transgenic salmon as food after listening to public concerns.
Originally the FDA, after extensive research, decided the genetically modified salmon was safe to eat and not harmful to the environment as long as it was farmed in facilities and not released in the wild. The text then goes on to say, "But so many people objected that the FDA decided to reconsider its decision." The other statements are simply incorrect.
4. C They show that people already eat genetically modified plant food without any issues or protest.
In the paragraphs, it explains that people in Canada are already eating some genetically modified food such as "tomatoes, corn, soya, canola, squash, milk products and other foods".
Answer:
nostalgic and benevolent.
Explanation:
The given text is taken from an 'Euology for President Reagan' written by Margaret Thatcher. The eulogy was orated on June 11, 2004.
The words that best describe that given text is nostalgic and benevolent. Nostalgic is a sentimental word that describes the feelings of happiness with personal association. Benevolent, on the other hand, is a word used to describe well-wishing.
The given text is a nostalgic trip to a memory lane of President Reagan's work and contribution to the US and the sympathy that his citizens have for him.
Thus the correct answer is the second option.
4. Memoir
5. Tells events in the order they happened. 6.Problem and solution
7. Where is the passage?
8. Where is the passage?
Answer:
D). Metro City residents with degrees outside the humanities have per capita income no higher than the per capita income of such residents of other cities of comparable size in the nation.
Explanation:
As per the question, option D displays the claim that would most appropriately empower the columnist's argument as this would substantiate his claim and establish the credibility of his argument.<u> It provides as an alternative and reasonable justification to the conclusion</u> that 'the key reason for Metro city residents having higher per capita in comparison to residents of other citizens' income is not only the lower percentage of the residents with humanities degrees' but simply <u>their higher earning is the major reason for their higher per-capita income than the residents of other states.</u> Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
