1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
15

What made Germany’s invasions of Europe difficult to stop during World War II?

History
1 answer:
Alex787 [66]3 years ago
5 0

Germany’s air attacks and fast-moving ground troops

The unstoppable forces that initially gave Germany a huge and continued success were based on a tactical strategic principle known as the Blitzkrieg:

quick and surprise attack by fast-moving troops (consisting of armored tanks and motorized divisions with infantry highly coordinated always supported with excel air divisions that easily break enemy frontlines. Since the attacks are short, quick and set striking the defenders are dislocated and the speed and surprise give the advantage to encircle them. In most cases, the defense lasted shorts and victory is achieved in a quick term.

-This was the key elements in order to understand the fall of Poland in just weeks, later the French suffered from this and for the initial phase of the World War gave Germany a huge morale boost.

-To the contrary when a large campaign was fought Germany's air attacks turned less successful. As in the case of the battle for England,the lasted effort was unsustainable when further conditions rendered the Blitzkrieg techniques inappropriate. As well , with Russia the initial fast paced attacks turned useless when a late and slow battle developed as they close in to Stalingrad.

You might be interested in
John Locke thiught people were neither good nor bad naturally.How did Hobbes views differ from lockes
ruslelena [56]

Answer:  Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

5 0
3 years ago
खपमा अन्य जिल्लाबाट मानिसहरू बसाइँसरी आउनुका पाँच कारणहरू लेख्नुहोस् ।​
storchak [24]

Write down five reasons why people from other districts have migrated to Khap.

5 0
2 years ago
The Mexican War was justified under the principle of __________.
Bingel [31]
The Mexican war was justified under the principle of Manifest Destiny       <span />
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The human and economic costs of world war 1 included
goblinko [34]

I believe the correct answer is D.

7 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP SO SO BAD
kari74 [83]

Answer:

Berlin

Great Britain

Berlin Air Lift

successful

Berlin Wall

1989

1961

Bay of Pigs

Fidel Castro

Cuban Missile  Crisis

Soviet Union

Vietnam

Chi Minh

unsuccessful

1973

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did tje fugitive slave act and the kansas nebraska act increaee tensions between north n south
    9·1 answer
  • In what ways was the golden age of akbar similar to and different from the flowering of the safavid empire under shah abbas and
    6·1 answer
  • Paris,France, is located on the shores of this river
    8·2 answers
  • With whom did John Sidell NOT have good relations? A. California B. Mexico C. Canada
    6·1 answer
  • Notes for early british colonies
    9·1 answer
  • In the mid-1800s what did chinese immigrants come to america for?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the complete definition of a gps
    6·1 answer
  • The answer is C... People around the world care about places of religious importance.
    15·1 answer
  • 5. Which of the following best describes King Louis XVI? *
    11·1 answer
  • What did functionalism contribute to modern psychology?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!