Answer:
Third one....The interest rate on your savings account will vary over time and be set by the government
Earn interest at a norminal rate.
Answer:
Case summary:
D is a college alum gets trapped in a blizzard on his way home. He was furnished with nourishment and haven by an old couple and he returned home once the climate was clear. D's dad F guaranteed the couple to pay $500 recorded as a hard copy for their assistance and the couple acknowledged. In any case, as D and F had contrasts later, F denied paying that sum.
Case investigation:
Thought: Consideration is the advantage or worth got by the gathering for satisfaction of their guarantee. On the off chance that there is no thought, the agreement isn't enforceable. Following are the components of thought:
-
Lawfully adequate worth: The thought ought to have some an incentive under the lawful arrangements.
-
Dealt trade: The thought ought to give the chance to deal between the gatherings. It implies one gathering should return something of significant worth to the next gathering for execution of that party.
For instance, an individual A guarantees B that he would pay $1,000 for driving him to chip away at that day. Here. An is paying $1,000 for B as an arrival for driving him to work (execution).
A guarantees him to give him a vehicle as he was graduated. It isn't thought since B didn't vow to perform anything. It is only a present for B from A.
Past Consideration: The guarantees which were made by a gathering for the presentation of activities in past by another gathering are unenforceable. As there is no anticipated trade component, it is no thought.
Right now, old couple gave haven to D. They neither guarantee D to give cover nor bartered that he ought to give them something to return.
F guaranteed them to pay $500 as a demonstration of thankfulness for their assistance yet it is a present for their assistance in past. In this way, it isn't past thought.
Consequently, the couple can't hold F at risk for making the installment for giving haven to his child.
<u>Answer: </u>Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the government tries to reduce the production or consumption of certain goods taxes can help the government to perform this action. Taxes alter the resource allocation by giving disincentives for production, consumption or exchange of these goods. Consumer decisions on savings and retirements can be controlled through taxes. Through affecting their decisions, their behavior to take actions based on the decision can also be changed.
By keeping a check on the incentives of the people through taxes the demand and supply can be decreased. This further decreases the productivity of the country.
Answer:
Point C
<em>Diagram is available online but cannot be imported due to its format</em>
Explanation:
A reduction in the cost of inputs means that suppliers will avail more fish in the market. An increase in supply caused by other factors other than price shifts the supply to the right. A shift of the supply curve outwards or the right makes the equilibrium point to move to capture an increase in supply.
In the diagram, the new equilibrium point will be at point C. The supply will increase due to a reduction in input costs.
Answer:
Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, Ethical concerns occur as workers face pressure from their employers to inflate profits or expenditures that include manipulating financial statements. Workers should be morally responsible and not participate in any dishonest behavior that modify the financial statements.
So, the correct answer is Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue
.
