1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
The following makes notes receivable :
- Notes receivable are formal written contracts.
- Notes receivable have a stronger legal claim.
- Notes receivable are interest bearing.
<h3>What are Notes Receivable?</h3>
Notes receivable are a balance sheet item that records the value of promissory notes that a business is owed and should receive payment for. A written promissory note gives the holder, or bearer, the right to receive the amount outlined in the legal agreement. Promissory notes are a written promise to pay cash to another party on or before a specified future date.
If the note receivable is due within a year, then it is treated as a current asset on the balance sheet. If it is not due until a date that is more than one year in the future, then it is treated as a non-current asset on the balance sheet.
Often, a business will allow customers to convert their overdue accounts (the business’ accounts receivable) into notes receivable. By doing so, the debtor typically benefits by having more time to pay.
Learn more about Notes Receivable on:
brainly.com/question/26965875
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. banks and mutual funds.
Explanation:
Financial intermediaries are bodies or individuals that connect surplus and deficit agents. These institutions serve as middlemen among diverse parties in financial transactions. These include banks, mutual funds, pension funds, building societies etc. Banks and mutual funds are two of the economy's most important financial intermediaries.
Answer:
$5 per case
Explanation:
Calculation for what The amount of the tax on a case of beer is $ per case.
Using this formula
Tax = Price Consumers Pay−Price Producers Receive
Let plug in the formula
Tax= $7 per case−$2per case
Tax=$5 per case
Therefore The amount of the tax on a case of beer is $5 per case
Answer:
1. low- involvement decisions may sometimes enable consumers to skip steps in the consumer decision making process.
Explanation:
Consumer decision making process includes all the steps between consumer's generation of needs/wants and final purchase of the product.
The process comprises of below mentioned 5 stages:
- Need recognition : whereby a need is generated
- Search for information so as to identify products satisfying such needs
- Evaluation of all available alternatives i.e assessment of all available products satisfying a need and selecting the best alternative.
- Purchases , the stage wherein the consumer buys the selected product.
- Post purchase evaluation, i.e the stage when consumer evaluates whether he made the right purchase decision.
In the given case, the consumer realized that he hadn't eaten at all during the day and thus instantly stopped at a restaurant, made a regular purchase of a burger without caring for the menu or set of other available alternatives.
Here, the investment decision related to a meal, being a low cost decision and occurring in a famished state. So consumers while making such low cost decisions may not find going through the menu and spending much time in deciding as worthwhile and in short will likely skip steps in the consumer decision making process.
