This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
Answer:
În română vă rog frumos să-mi trimiteți și mie o problemă
Answer:
Better transition of the sentence is:
Option B: When we got to our campground, it was only mid-morning, but the campsites were already filling up fast.
Explanation:
Option B clearly explains that it was mid morning when they reached the campground but campsites were filling up fast.
Option A is incorrect as it says that people were trying to grab campsites when they reached. Option C says that they should have left earlier, so it is incorrect. Option D also doesn't mention about the early filling up of the camp. Thus, of all the options, the better transition will be statement B.
