Answer:
a. how would an economist explain the decline of the alaska king crab fishery?
According to economist, the decline of the Alaska king crab fishery could be compared to Law of diminshing returns. This simply means that, the optimal fishing point was reached before the fishes available started declining leading to the fishing bust that happened in 1980s.
b. explain two programs you could institute to protect the fishery and still allow some crabbing again.
Fishing Time policy: This program would involve the restriction of the fishing activities carried out in the alaska to a given time frame. For example, from september to december. Rather than fishing always as was done.
Fishing Quantity Policy: This program would in involve the restriction of the quantity of fishes to be gotten in the cook inlet and bristol bay by the fishing companies. For example, each company is expected to take only 50kg worth of fish once a week rather than fishing unlimitedly each day.
c. canadians have been very successful in farming salmon in coastal fiords along the coast of british columbia. why have they been successful with salmon when the crab fishery crashed?
This is because, their are series of policies that tends to guide the farming of salmon in the coastal fiords by the Canadians. And, also, salmon is not as demanding as the King Crab fishes.
Explanation:
Answer:
slavery. being put in the ghettos and other such activities
The answer is D. Miranda incriminated himself
without knowing that he could refuse to do so. The court did not inform
him of his rights and in doing so violated the Fifth Amendment or
self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment or the right to counsel.
While he was staying in Mexico city, he saw how the central government was broke and how the municipalities of Texas had little hope if they didn't take the matters in their own hands. He recommended them to unite, organize a state and refuse the application by the supreme government, this led to his arrest and futher quarrel with the mexican government. At this point, while he was in prison, tensions grew between Texas and the central government, after the institution of a law which prohibited people not born in Mexico from retailing goods in the state, Texas went on the offence and Austin participated in the revolution.
