Answer: Chronosystem.
Urie Bronfenbrenner, an American psychologist, developed the Ecological Systems Theory as an explanation to how children interact with their environment and how in turn the environment affects the child’s development.
The first four levels of the system are:
Microsystem <em>(Immediate Environment)
</em>
Mesosystem <em>(Connections)
</em>
Exosystem <em>(Indirect Environment)
</em>
Macrosystem <em>(Social and Cultural Values)
</em>
The last system, which underlies all the other levels is the Chronosystem. This system introduces time to the theory. It includes changes over time in a small level (changes to family structure, changes in social circle) and changes at a social level (wars, recessions, etc.).
Answer: a. quid pro quo harassment
Explanation: In legal terms, a quid pro quo is a form of sexual harassment that can be found mostly in working places. It is a situation where one is of a superior position or standing and demands sexual relations as a favor from the other. It is commonly known as "this for that" or "scratch my back and i scratch yours" with sexual relations as the catalyst.
I hope this helps.
Mental illnesses of short duration are generally considered to be "acute".
In medicine, portraying a sickness as acute signifies that it is of brief term and, as a result of that, of recent beginning. The quantitation of how much time comprises "short" and "recent" shifts by infection and by setting of the disease, however the main meaning of "acute" is in every case subjectively in opposition with "chronic", which indicates an old and long sickness.
Answer:FEDERALISM is practiced in India by :The creation of Linguistic States was the first and a major test for democratic politics in our country. ... In 1947 the boundaries of several old States were changed in order to create new States. This was done to ensure that people who spoke the same language lived in the same State.
Explanation:
This is an example of C. importance of political knowledge.
These people didn't know enough about politics and the politicians they were voting for which is evident based on this question. They favored some politicians because they were gullible and didn't understand that favoring them won't really give them any benefits. If they had more knowledge, they would probably have voted for a better candidate.