1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
10

U guys can u help meh out a litte bit if yall dont mind 30 points and i can give u more if its right pule a free branlist

History
1 answer:
Monica [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Question 1 options:

Mississippi River

St. Lawrence River

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Evaluate the extent to which the progressive movement fostered political change in the united states from 1890 to 1920.
yawa3891 [41]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Evaluate the extent to which the progressive movement fostered political change in the united states from 1890 to 1920.

During a time of many changes in the conformation of the United States, the Progressive movement from 1890 to 1920 was a period where reformations accomplished many things that the American people needed. The most important: to modernize a federal government that needed a "shake and some cleaning," and reformations that improved education and promoted suffrage for women in America. Many journalists started to investigate corruption cases in the government and exposed them in their newspapers. The passage of the 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution was another important piece of legislation in the Progressive Era.

5 0
4 years ago
Most Americans agreed on what two changes to the articles of confederation
vlada-n [284]
They agreed to change the Articles of Confederation to grant congress the power to 1) regulate commerce and 2) tax the people.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE ANSWER ASAP WIL GIVE BRAINLYEST AND WILL REPORT :)
velikii [3]

Answer:

the answer is d

Explanation:

please give brainliest?

4 0
3 years ago
Why would the Framers of the U.S. Constitution give the power of making laws the
fgiga [73]

Answer:

 The framers of the Constitution understood from an experienced point of view the problem of allowing any one man or group to have unyielding power.  To ensure such tyranny did not become part of the new government they instituted numerous checks on the power of the government.  The limitations placed upon each was twofold.  It required the partitions of the federal government to work in concert according to the mandates of the people and it ensured no portion of the government had the power to trample individual liberty.

    The three branches of the government have different and if unchecked vastly powerful divisions of the government.  The Executive Branch, consisting of the governing officials such as the President are controlled by the people through the vote as well as the other two branches.  This limits the ability of the President to make decrees outside the bounds of the Constitution.  This was a very real concern of the founders having experienced the oppression of the British Crown.

    The Legislative Branch, made up of Congress has the power of the purse.  By controlling the federal budget and enacting legislation the group could quickly overwhelm the public with burdensome mandates.  They are controlled via the vote, and the other two branches to control their power.

    Finally the Judicial Branch, the courts have power to send innocent people to jail.  This was perhaps the second greatest concern of the founders.  Some courts are held in check by direct vote, but even those appointed are subject to disciplinary measures if they are found to act outside their jurisdiction.  Another key aspect in controlling courts is the Executive ability to grant pardons.

    The balancing act the federal government is forced to endure certainly slows down the process and deliberately so.  The government was designed to be slow to act to ensure no one's rights were violated.  Ultimately the states as a collective have a check over the federal system as well through the ability to amend the Constitution when needed.  The founders knew that two heads were better than one and a hundred were better than two.  They compromised on speed, but took security in the thought that a slow right was better than a quick wrong.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Yeoman ideal had such far-reaching appeal in the early nineteenth century?
sergejj [24]

Explanation:

The average household on Mississippi's yeoman farmsteads contained 6.0 members, slightly above the statewide average of 5.8 and well above the steadily declining average for northern bourgeois families. A quarter of Mississippi's yeoman households contained at least 8 members, and many included upward of 10.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which area were the Progressives unsuccessful?
    11·1 answer
  • Who is the Forgotten man FDR refers to
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Daniel Shays rebel against the government?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the main result of the election in 1860?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did recruiting for the army become more difficult
    11·1 answer
  • 5. This hotel was built in Tampa and now University of Tampa
    12·1 answer
  • Which country took over the Dutch New Netherland in the late 1600s? A. England B. Sweden France D. Spain
    13·1 answer
  • What farming practices were not harmful during dust bowl era
    7·1 answer
  • Allied forces experienced high death rates because
    13·2 answers
  • What were Cordell Hull opinions on Hitler/Germany?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!