The correct answer is "Both authors state that coral reefs are polluting the ocean floor". That is the statement that is not true.
The rest of the statements are true:
1 - Both authors state that coral reefs are threatened.
(author 1) due to enviromental causes such us light, temperature, etc.
(author 2) little has been done to proctect them
2 - Both authors suggest that something must be done to save the reefs
(author 1) if the problem continues there will not be a suitable home for sea life
(author 2) establishing more parks would help
3 - Both authors suggest that coral reefs are fragile.
(author 1) states that the coral reefs fall apart
(author 2) says that they have a fragile enviroment
A foil is a character whose traits are distinct or different from another character. Rainsford's character is highlighted by its difference from Zaroff's character. Zaroof is ruthless and cruel while Rainsford is compassionate and values life. You could say that their characters are the complete opposite.
Answer: Hall knew that growing outrage among the American public would help Britain's cause.
Explanation: According the the excerpt, it says that "Hall reminded them", thus saying that Hall was not in favor of waiting before presenting the telegram.
Hall didn't want to wait until American outrage simmered down before revealing the contents of the telegram. No where in the excerpt does it hint this.
Hall wasn't worried that the Americans would lose interest in the contents of the telegram. The telegram contained information that would alert the Americans of a possible attack from Mexico.
Hall did disagree with the waiting, but the excerpt is hinting that Hall wanted to use the telegram to gain supporters for Britain against the Germans.
Cheers
(If I'm wrong, then the answer is that Hall disagreed with the British government's choice to wait before showing the telegraph to Wilson)
C.He believes TV is so normal, no one thinks about it. (apex)
