Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
Answer:
The answer would be the first 10 Amendments equal treatment under law privileges granted to some freedoms granted to all people
Explanation:
Hope this helps. Please mark me as brainliest
Answer:
an inability to eat a food or take a drug without adverse effects.
Explanation:
I believe it would be the Jim crow law
The jim crow law is a set of regulations that is aimed to racially segregate the infrastructure that can be used by black and white citizens after the reconstruction.
The laws prohibit blacks citizens to use the same schools, public transportation, restaurants, or hospital as the white citizens.
Since the infrastructures that can be used by black citizens typically lower in quality, it really limited the chance that black people have to advance and prosper in the society.
