Answer:69.420
Step-by-step explanation:
I just want points
Answer:
1. 516 ppm; 2. 561 ppm
Step-by-step explanation:
1. CO₂ increase at old rate
Time = 2100 - 2010 = 90 years
Increase in CO₂ = 90 yr × (1.4 ppm/1 yr) = 126 ppm
CO₂ in 2010 = 390 + 126 = 516 ppm
At the old rate, the CO₂ concentration in 2100 will be 516 ppm.
2. CO₂ increase at new rate
Time = 2100 - 2010 = 90 years
Increase in CO₂ = 90 yr × (1.9 ppm/1 yr) = 171 ppm
CO₂ in 2010 = 390 + 171 = 561 ppm
At the new rate, the CO₂ concentration in 2100 will be 561 ppm.
Answer:
With the given margin of error its is possible that candidate A wins and candidate B loses, and it is also possible that candidate B wins and candidate A loses. Therefore, the poll cannot predict the winner and this is why race was too close to call a winner.
Step-by-step explanation:
A group conducted a poll of 2083 likely voters.
The results of poll indicate candidate A would receive 47% of the popular vote and and candidate B would receive 44% of the popular vote.
The margin of error was reported to be 3%
So we are given two proportions;
A = 47%
B = 44%
Margin of Error = 3%
The margin of error shows by how many percentage points the results can deviate from the real proportion.
Case I:
A = 47% + 3% = 50%
B = 44% - 3% = 41%
Candidate A wins
Case II:
A = 47% - 3% = 44%
B = 44% + 3% = 47%
Candidate B wins
As you can see, with the given margin of error its is possible that candidate A wins and candidate B loses, and it is also possible that candidate B wins and candidate A loses. Therefore, the poll cannot predict the winner and this is why race was too close to call a winner.
Answer:
Width is 2 if that's what you were looking for.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm guessing it's a rectangle and you want the width?
22-9-9=2w
2w=4
The width is 2
