1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
15

What does objection mean

Law
1 answer:
n200080 [17]3 years ago
5 0
Disapproval or to oppose
You might be interested in
Which is NOT been a reason for the increased need of forensic science evidence?
Amiraneli [1.4K]

is it a muipty quinson

5 0
2 years ago
What types of weapons were used in the shooting?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

handguns

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
HELP PLZ ASAP!!!!
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.

Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
erastova [34]
Physiology of an individual.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being consci
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.

Explanation:

Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination mean?a. That a person only has to be a witness against him
    8·2 answers
  • According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think the crime control model or the due process model is better for society? Why? 15 lines
    5·1 answer
  • 4. To determine the value of something you own
    7·1 answer
  • Argentina cuenta con un sistema presidencialista?
    15·1 answer
  • The Four S's in the vehicle movement checklist are?
    5·1 answer
  • what does research state about the effectiveness of appointed counsel verse privately funded counsel?
    12·1 answer
  • If you are justice please do not lie<br>what is the price for your blind eye?​
    12·1 answer
  • Alcohol first affects the area of the brain that controls
    7·1 answer
  • Where Can you find your state specific lottery information to sell lottery tickets in redeem winning lottery
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!