No, I don't think that all students experience same exposure to literacy at home while growing up.
A preschooler whose home environment provides fewer opportunities for acquiring knowledge and skills related to books and reading is at slightly higher risk for reading difficulties than a child whose home environment provides a richer literacy environment. Singing songs, telling stories, and reading nursery rhymes or children's books expand a child's vocabulary, preparing them for successful reading comprehension when they eventually learn to read.
Literacy development is an essential component of your child's overall growth. It serves as the foundation for succeeding in school, socializing with others, problem-solving, decision-making, developing independence, managing money, and working.
Learn more about literacy here:
brainly.com/question/10666756
#SPJ9
Answer:
to be ignored and treated poorly
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
