Answer: ok first correct punish with discipline
and if you dont mind im going to give you a whole new one not the one you provided... law enforcement officer s are there to serve and protect they discipline those who break the laws. they are also here to assist people with their problems.
Explanation: if you want to you can take parts from that and add on to it or use this
The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Yes, A judge has power to overrule a decision.
A jury verdict may be overturned by the judge in any trial when there is inadequate evidence to back it or if the decision awarded insufficient compensatory damages. The judge is the final arbiter in any trial.
Two situations call for the use of overrule: (1) when a lawyer challenges the legality of evidence at trial; and (2) when an appeal court renders its decision.
The process of overruling involves a court lower on the legal food chain overturning a decision made in a prior case. The judgments of subordinate courts may be overturned by higher courts. Supreme courts have the authority to reverse precedents that have been set by lower courts. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the country when it comes to setting precedent and deciding decisions that fall under its purview.
To know more about judge:
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
Answer:
The anti-Federalists and their opposition to ratifying the Constitution were a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Amercians' civil liberties. The anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power invested in the national government at the expense of states. (Howard Chandler Christy's interpretation of the signing of the Constitution,
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
