Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
I think it’s only 2 but I’m not completely sure
1. Brad did not ask for custody when they were just separated, like where was he during the years of separation.
2. He is picking favorites
3. He is willing to abandon 3 of his kids
Answer:
When you hit the breaks like that you are creating friction so that is what make your bike tires hot and the road look like that.
Explanation:
