The narrators are the unreliable first person. so unreliable
<h3>
Answer: Choice D</h3>
...he that was strongest secured the best place; and few left the trough satisfied
============================================================
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass is describing the horrific conditions of what kind of food he ate and the conditions in which he had his meals. At the start of the paragraph, he describes the food itself (a corn meal called Mush). Then later on he describes how the food was served in a very degrading inhumane way (the food being served in a trough; effectively treating them as animals). Shortly after, he goes over how the food was eaten through a variety of means: use of oyster shells, shingles, or bare hands. None of which involves the regular utensils you'd expect such as a spoon.
At the very end of the excerpt, Frederick Douglass mentions that "He that ate the fastest got most; he was strongest secured the best place; and few left the trough satisfied". This effectively means that even though the food itself was horrible, and the conditions degrading, people were still hungry and had no other choice. Also, even the people who were able to eat the most weren't truly/fully fed.
So in short, the last part of the excerpt describes that the slaves weren't fed enough. If we could narrow down the cited evidence as much as possible, the portion that mentions "few left the trough satisfied" is the thing you should focus on.
Hey there,
The following question's are the questions that I will answer.
When trying to distinguish between fiction and nonfiction, does the line between genres become blurred? Or, are there clear differences between these genres—like comparing apples to oranges? List and discuss the traits that you see in fiction and nonfiction works. Provide examples of each. Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction. What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres? Ultimately, would you rather read fiction or nonfiction?
Question #1
When trying to distinguish between fiction and nonfiction, does the line between genres become blurred?
Often, yes. Fiction and (non)-fiction can be very blurred when comparing. You have one genre that can totally be in a real case, and then you have (alot) of times where as fiction (itself) is just very (non) real. Like for example, "The Flintstones." That is fiction. We are not going to real live like them. They scrape there feet when they drive, (like who does that).
Question #2
Or, are there clear differences between these genres—like comparing apples to oranges?
Yes, not exactly all the time (fiction) & (non-fiction) is like this, but, the majority of the time,(fiction) & (non-fiction) can be like (apple & oranges)
Question #3
List and discuss the traits that you see in fiction and nonfiction works. Provide examples of each. Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction. What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres?
(Trait's that I see in fiction and nonfiction works. )
Some trait's that I see are that fiction works deal with alot of e.g: magic, human flying, and things that are not really real and things that can not be applied in real life. Now for the nonfiction work, this stuff would be real. I can apply movies like "paper town's) or "fault in our stars" and things like that. But things like "Batman (vs) Superman" and "Cars 3" and things like that are not real.
(Explain what you like and dislike about both fiction and nonfiction.)
I dont really like fiction. I love real life things. Things that can really happen in real life. I love that vibe. but also, I do like things like "spider-man" and things like that because they are cool. But I like more fiction things better. (opinion)
(What are some examples of works you have read that dance the line between both genres?)
Some things or (examples) that I know the align with both genre's would be things like "the way people feel" like you can tell in both genre's how the character feels. The things that are also things that line together would be things like (conflicts) and things like (exposition's) and (climax). They all either have (cliff hangers) and things that get a person excited. They also contain things like "love" and things like "romantic" and they also show different (POV). So those are some things that would have aligned together.
Question #4 (last question)
(Ultimately, would you rather read fiction or nonfiction?)
I would rather read (fiction). I like the real feel of when a story is true and not just a little fake things.
_____________________________________________________________
I really hope this helps you. I tried my hardest on this and I also hope this helps future people in (advance).
~Jurgen
D. It's up to you to decide what to do.
Possessive noun usually includes an apostrophe such as Nene's bear, plant's soil, earth's mass and a lot more. Therefore, the possessive noun in the new coat belonging to Sharon is Sharon's that is Sharon's new coat. Add 's to those singular or plural nouns that do not end in s however, add only an apostrophe to plural nouns that already ends in s. Moreover, possessive nouns can be personal pronouns too. Personal pronouns actually shows or displays ownership of something especially in a sentence plus it does not the 's form of the word. Possessive pronouns inlude we, mine, her, his, ours, theirs<span> and a lot more.
</span>
