Answer:
Personal distress or dysfunction
Explanation:
When a person's behaviour is out of ordinary, undesirable or even dysfunctional it is characterized as an abnormal behaviour.
A personal distress in abnormal behaviour is a type of psychological disorder that occurs when an individual's behavior is upsetting, not socially or culturally acceptable, and not pleaseant in any way. It happens when an individual breaks down emotionally and this breakdown is often linked to distress.
Frances tested positive for use of marijuana which is not socially acceptable by her company. In turn she developes a mental illness because she lost her job, her type of abnormal behaviour can be characterized as personal dysfunction.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because they granted rights to African Americans.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
The most likely social effect of this information is that People who drive pickup trucks will become safer while driving.
<h3>What is
social effect?</h3>
Social impact is the effect on people as well as communities which do occur due to an action or inaction, an activity, project as well as programme or policy.
In this case, it should be noted that most likely social effect of this information is that People who drive pickup trucks will become safer while driving.
We can conclude that do have a positive impact on the life of people and this can encompass some of the steps that can be used to improve the social as well as the environment standard of the people in the society hence, social effect can be postive effect.
Learn more about social effect from
brainly.com/question/25726765
#SPJ1
