Answer:
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that,
Fabiola pays 357 pesos for 40 liters of fuel.
It is required to convert the amount in dollars.
Since, we know that,
1 peso = 0.0759 dollars
So, 357 pesos = 0.0759 × 357 = 27.0963 dollars
Moreover,
1 liter = 0.219969 gallons
So, 40 liters = 0.219969 × 40 = 8.79877 gallons
Thus, we get that,
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
Answer:
C. A capital expenditure.
Explanation:
This is an example of a capital expenditure as it makes significant improvements to the machines and extends the life considerably.
These types of expenses are capitalized in the balance sheets under the original asset name and the asset is revalued by the improvement cost and stated at net book value + improvement.
Revised depreciation is then calculated on this new NBV as applicable with increased life of asset.
Hope that helps.
No, most likely it’s a scam. People like to scam people to get money now a days. It’s just a way for “easy” money for people who are desperate!
Answer:
Extrinsic value is the portion of the worth that has been assigned to an item by external factors.
Hope this helped a little!
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
