Answer:D) Id
Explanation: This is referred by Freud as a pleasure principle because it makes one do what they want to do without even thinking about the outcome as long as it is going to please them .
For Suzie taking the toy without considering the other child's feeling it shows she was only thinking about satisfying her own need or pleasure .
Answer:
state courts. because it is and just know
Explanation:
trust
The correct option is (A) Joint ventures.
Joint ventures is/are often a political necessity because of nationalism and government restrictions on foreign ownership.
<h3>
What is joint venture?</h3>
A joint venture is a business that was started by two or more persons and is often characterised by shared control, ownership, and returns. The following types are among them:
Joint Venture Project. This is the kind of joint venture that is most common.
Vertical Joint Venture;
Functional Joint Venture;
Horizontal Joint Venture
For instance, in order to pool their US assets for the distribution of their beer brands in the US and Puerto Rico, two brewing and beverage companies, SABMiller and Molson Coors, launched a horizontal joint venture in 2007.
Learn more about the Joint venture with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14486798
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is c) The ability to automatize driving and dedicate the majority of your attention to the conversation.
Explanation:
Being able to drive a car while you carry on a conversation with a friend in the passenger seat is explained by your ability to concentrate on driving and the people or vehicles around the environment, and also block out all forms of distraction, but still dedicate majority of your attention to the conversation.
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
