Answer:
The answer would be neutrality of money theory
Explanation:
The neutrality of money theory claims that changes in the money supply affect the prices of goods, services, and wages but not overall economic productivity. Many of today's economists believe the theory is still applicable, at least over the long run.
Answer:
<em>Value $ 256,250</em>
<em>rounding against nearest 1,000 dollar: 256,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
From the gross income we subtract the expenses and vanacy losses.
40,000 gross income - 3,500 vacancy - 16,000 operating expense
20,500 net
<em />
Now, we solve for the present value of a perpetuity given the capitalziation rate of 8%
$ 20,500 / 0.08 = <em>$ 256,250</em>
Obtain a customer signed statement acknowledging that an annuity transaction is not recommended if a customer decides to enter into an annuity transaction that is not based on the insurance producer's or insurer's recommendation.
<h3>Who is responsible for verifying your suitability?</h3>
The insurer or third party delegate authorized pursuant to section 224.
6(c) of Regulation 187 conducts a suitability review prior to the issuance of an insurance product or the effectuation of a sales transaction; and.
The insurer has procedures designed to prevent financial exploitation and abuse.
<h3>What factors are important considerations when determining suitability of an annuity sale?</h3>
Suitability Information Gathered by an Insurer
- Age.
- Annual income.
- Financial situation and needs, including the financial resources you're using to fund the annuity.
- Financial experience.
- Financial goals and objectives.
- Intended use of the annuity.
- Financial time horizon.
Learn more about insurance here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/15171641</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Idk I can’t see the choices sorry which I could help
Explanation:
a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.
b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.
c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.
