1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>
The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
- Prevent terrorism
- Enhance security
- Secure and manage U.S. borders
- Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.
Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
- Border security
- Aviation security
- Countering terrorism
- Emergency response
- Chemical facility inspection
- IT and cybersecurity security
- Natural disaster planning and response.
Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
This is only 5 points but... I think that death penalty should continue as a form of punishment because if someone did something horrible (for example killing many people) they should be punished and jail time is not enough. - Brooke
Life sentence. Killing someone while driving is called vehicular homicide, while driving drunk is a DUI. The two together can lead to a life sentence, however, it varies greatly depending on the State and Nation.
I hope I've helped! :)
King John demanded soldiers or money from his barons in order to carry on a war in France over disputed lands. Many of the barons believed that the dispute between John and the French king was none of their business. So, they refused to send King John knights or pay what amounted to a special tax.
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
