Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Contributing to the common good is a duty of all citizens. Try this
Answer:
B
Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)
Answer:
an employer has the right to control what work will be done and how that work will be done
Explanation:
Common Law Employee
Answer:
Nell’s debt to Olsen is past due. Olsen obtains an order of garnishment to require Nell’s employer Pro Transmission Service, Inc., to pay part of Nell’s paycheck to Olsen. The law <u>limits the amount that can be taken from Nell's take-home pay.</u>
Explanation:
A wage garnishment is when a court issues an order requiring your employer to withhold a certain amount of your paycheck and send it directly to the person or institution to whom you owe money, until your debt is paid off.
