1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
13

The defendant will not be found liable for defamation, regardless of intent or knowledge of the falsity of the claim, if which p

rivilege exists?a. Simpleb. Complexc. Defamationd. Absolutee. None of these
Law
1 answer:
IgorLugansk [536]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Honestly,<em> none of these</em>.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
'Victimhood is not an objective assessment of harm
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

This concept is used by European countries.

Explanation:

The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.

7 0
3 years ago
What is friction? and how it works ?​
andrezito [222]

Answer:

is a action of two objects rubbing togetther on a surface

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a boy liked you and two other liked you what would you do.
anastassius [24]
Pick the one that’s nicer and if not the. Just pick the cuter one
3 0
3 years ago
What are examples of procedural laws?
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

A procedural law example may be a method of filing a lawsuit such as the requirement of a complaint and service of summons; or rules of evidence such as the hearsay rule

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary.
lora16 [44]

Answer:

The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. A person is generally justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

Explanation:

Use of force. Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did Columbus's 1st and 4th voyages have in common?
    7·1 answer
  • Why does the us government only address certain equal protection cases?
    5·1 answer
  • Whats a boomer explain please
    8·2 answers
  • The vehicle code includes regulations regarding?
    15·2 answers
  • School related question for those that will answer instead of reporting:Has Trump helped our nation, country better than anyone
    5·1 answer
  • Ben has a credit score of 540. How would that be categorized?
    13·2 answers
  • Points<br>.............​
    8·1 answer
  • Want fifty points? Well here u go. LOL
    11·1 answer
  • Transparency and accountable is one of the principle of dimocratic system why
    12·1 answer
  • What are the five basic freedoms guaranteed by the first amendment?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!