Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
First, suppose that nothing has changed, and possibility p is still 0.56. It's our null hypothesis. Now, we've got Bernoulli distribution, but 30 is big enough to consider Gaussian distribution instead.
It has mean μ= np = 30×0.56=16.8
standard deviation s = √npq
sqrt(30×0.56×(1-0.56)) = 2.71
So 21 is (21-16.8)/2.71 = 1.5494 standard deviations above the mean. So the level increased with a ˜ 0.005 level of significance, and there is sufficient evidence.
Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318
Answer:
D. no solution because the other answers if you plug them in dont work
Answer:
using y=mx +c
c=0
m=y2-y2/x2-x1
m=16-0/2-0
m=8
y=8x+0
y=8x
hope that helped
if yes give me brainliest and if no draw my attention by hitting the comment section
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking us to simply evaluate 1 + 1. 1 + 1 equals 2.
