The answer is fundamental attribution error. This is our inclination to clarify somebody's conduct in light of interior elements, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside elements, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct.
The answer is: Scientists study how things work while engineers create new things
Tom refused to accept Sam's input and change his attitude. Interestingly, the input provided by Sam further strengthened Tom's initial attitude. This is an example of a: <u>contrast effect</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
A contrast effect is the term used in psychology to explain the aggravation or decline, cognition or related performance as a result of consecutive or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension.
The type of contrast depends upon the how the participant considers a situation. There are two types of contrast effect. They are
i) Positive contrast effect
ii) Negative contrast effect
In the above scenario, Tom and Sam were discussing about the tax rates. Conflict arises between them when Sam objects Tom’s view on tax rates. Tom got aggravated and strengthened his attitude.
She is likely exhibiting ethnocentrism. This is being
defined as a way of showing judgement towards to other cultures based on their
own standards that they are accustomed of or in their own culture. The American
likely acted that way after seeing crickets to be eaten by locals because it is
not normal or a tradition for their culture to eat bugs or even cover them with chocolates as
they eat it.
