1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
3 years ago
13

The figure shows two similar triangles on a coordinate grid: A coordinate grid is shown from positive 6 to negative 6 on the x-a

xis and from positive 6 to negative 6 on the y-axis. A triangle ABC is shown with vertex A on ordered pair negative 3, 3, vertex B on ordered pair 0, 0 and vertex C on ordered pair negative 6, negative 3. A triangle A prime B prime C prime is also shown with vertex A prime on ordered pair 1, 1, vertex B prime on ordered pair 0, 0, and vertex C prime on ordered pair 2, negative 1. Which set of transformations have been performed on triangle ABC to form triangle A'B'C'? Dilation by a scale factor of 1 over 3 followed by reflection about the x-axis Dilation by a scale factor of 3 followed by reflection about the x-axis Dilation by a scale factor of 1 over 3 followed by reflection about the y-axis Dilation by a scale factor of 3 followed by reflection about the y-axis

Mathematics
1 answer:
SIZIF [17.4K]3 years ago
5 0

From what I know, figure ABC has gotten smaller so you wouldn't use either options that suggests a dilation of 3, because that would mean it got bigger. (But please correct me if I'm wrong.) Also, if you look at the little unit square measurements on the graph, looking at figure ABC, C is 6 units from B, while in figure A'B'C', C' is 2 units from B', which 6÷2=3 meaning that A'B'C' would most likely be a third of its size.

Next the figure is being mirrored over the y-axis which is the vertical line going up and down.

So the answer would be the option that says

"Dilation by a scale factor of 1 over 3 followed by a reflection about the y-axis"

I hope that it's right, because I haven't practiced this in a while, and I hope this made some sense.

You might be interested in
Expand using binomial theorem
kari74 [83]
The answer is -1
Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
How many timescas thick as the oceans epipelagic zone is the hadalpelgic zone... work or explanaion please..
NISA [10]
Flip your chicken strips! hadalpealic - -6 km and dp
5 0
3 years ago
Why is a variable exponent a number plus a variable adds eg: (x)*+(x) =?<br>​
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

10+10=20

debes  omer bien putasc

3 0
3 years ago
A survey of 1,562 randomly selected adults showed that 522 of them have heard of a new electronic reader. The accompanying techn
tester [92]

Answer:

a) We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.35  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.35  

And is a two tailed test

b) z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326  

c) p_v =2*P(z  

d) Null hypothesis:p=0.35  

e) Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1562 represent the random sample selected

X=522 represent the people who have heard of a new electronic reader

\hat p=\frac{522}{1562}=0.334 estimated proportion of people who have heard of a new electronic reader

p_o=0.35 is the value to verify

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

p_v represent the p value

Part a

We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.35  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.35  

And is a two tailed test

Part b

The statistic for this case is given :

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326  

Part c

We can calculate the p value using the laternative hypothesis with the following probability:

p_v =2*P(z  

Part d

The null hypothesis for this case would be:

Null hypothesis:p=0.35  

Part e

The best conclusion for this case would be:

Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

5 0
3 years ago
Using the number line below to compare the list of numbers. Place the numbers in increasing order.
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

-2/5

-1.5

.3

1 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

The higher the negatice number, the lower it is. Hope this helps:)

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The distances (y), in miles, of two cars from their starting points at certain times (x), in hours, are shown by the equations b
    13·2 answers
  • G(x) = 3x - 9<br><br> g(-1) =
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this??
    10·1 answer
  • Find the sum using distributive property 72+9
    14·1 answer
  • One dozen eggs were purchased for $.89 how much do three eggs cost
    9·2 answers
  • Fred has 45 books. Sally has 27 times more books than Fred. How many books does Sally have?
    12·1 answer
  • Х+ Зу = 6<br> бx — бу = 4
    12·2 answers
  • Sally's income per month is $1500. She wants to create a budget to be able to afford everything. How much can she spend on "fun"
    11·1 answer
  • Which set of ordered pairs does not represent a function? part 2
    5·2 answers
  • 6. Find the value of the variable that results in congruent triangle
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!