War is the unexpected setting that Haidt outlines where people experience self-transcendence. Nothing brings people together like a battle, and that bringing them together opens up the prospect of remarkable self-transcendent experiences, thus many individuals claim to have found the self-transcendence there.
Fundamentally, self-transcendence is about transcending (or getting above) the self and relating to something bigger than the self. In plainer terms, it means accepting your place as a minor component of a larger whole and acting accordingly.
Self-transcendence values, in contrast, are anxiety-free and socially focused, reflecting a growth incentive and concern for others' well-being over one's own. As a result, they may boost prosociality, which fosters the development and maintenance of relationships.
Learn more about self-transcendence here:
brainly.com/question/8186224
#SPJ4
Mangelwurzel, Beets and most commonly Turnips were used.
Answer:
The answer is True.
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
Therefore,
In "Democracy, Climate Change and Global Governance" authors Held and Hervey argued that modern democracies are less able to respond to complex global issues because they suffer from interest group concentration. By this they meant that our political system requires politicians to respond to small, well organized interest groups with narrow interests.True
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
Answer:yes
Explanation: Because they were a Goverment who everyone had a say because they wanted to rule together not by one person that’s why they left the monarch on england
