United States of America, Brazil, Peru, Canada, Mexico
I believe the answer is: <span>Social trap
</span><span>Social trap refers to a situation when a certain individual obtain some sort of gain/benefit in the short run but would cause the society as a whole some sort of loss/damage in the long run.
Other example would be when someone cut down trees to increase their profit but resulted in fresh air shortage for the environment.</span>
Explanation:
The best way is to give the environment over entirely to the fossil-fuel industry to exploit for its “needs.” The horrific human arrogance that holds that our species has “dominion” over the Earth has produced the worst catastrophe in human history. So please, go ahead and continue to believe that “man” can and should “adapt the environment to his needs.” We are doomed now, since governments have been reluctant to act to reduce fossil-fuel use. WE are not - repeat: NOT - the only forms of life on the planet. Moreover, contrary to the wicked pronouncements of religions, especially Christianity, WE do not - repeat, NOT - have “dominion” over the Earth. Hope that answer is satisfactory for this question. If not, please go to the Internet and watch videos of California in flames, Bangladesh in strangling floods, and do read the last article of Bill McKibben, one of the great climate-change journalists in the world, and see that we are now going over the cliff, thanks to the monstrous Republican regime in the US, with the aid of other countries, to extinction. It is not so much that WE matter. There are many other species on Earth and human beings have succeeded now in wiping out 60 percent of them.
Answer:
Could have set up new laws
Explanation:
