Answer:
Perceptual defense
Explanation:
The perceptual defense is a process by which a catalyst alarming offensive and disagreeable are either not perceived or per-verted in perception especially when presented as brief flame. It is a non-recognition threatening stimuli. A stimulus may register outside of the awareness and bring about a change in response
There are two conditions must be there
1) The stimulus must be relevant
2) It must be maintained over time.
Answer:
The options are
A. during the game, a person in a gorilla suit walked into and out of the scene; almost everyone failed to notice
B. during the game, a person in a gorilla suit walked into and out of the scene, nearly half failed to notice
C. a person in a gorilla suit was one of the ball passers, almost no one failed to notice
D. a person in a gorilla suit was one of the ball passers, nearly half failed to notice
The answer is - A. during the game, gorilla suit walked in and out, almost everyone failed to notice.
The experiment by Simon and Chabris in 1999 involved participants watching people passing a basketball around in order to keep track of some activity within the game. The distinctive feature of the scene in which a proportion of people failed to notice was during the game, gorilla suit walked in and out, almost everyone failed to notice.
Answer:
B- individuals tend to take more responsibility for reporting crimes than do groups of people
Explanation:
crowds of people make it easier for individuals to ignore crimes, since an individual would think it's okay to ignore crimes if others are ignoring it.
