The conclusion that we can draw is that a. Twain believed the United States did not have a right to the territories it held overseas.
<h3>What were Twain's views on imperialism?</h3><h3 />
The relevant excerpt is not attached but the answer can be inferred based on Twain's historical views.
Mark Twain was against American imperialism and believed that the U.S. should not inflict upon others, what the British had inflicted on them.
He would therefore most likely believe that the U.S. did not have a right to the foreign lands it possessed.
Find out more on Mark Twain at brainly.com/question/11926015.
#SPJ1
I looked this up
Japan's only chance was the element of surprise and to destroy America's navy as quickly as possible. Japan wanted to move into the Dutch East Indies and Malaya to conquer territories that could provide important natural resources such as oil and rubber.
War between Japan and the United States had been a possibility that each nation's military forces planned for in the 1920s, though real tension did not begin until the 1931 invasion of Manchuria by Japan.
Hope this helps
Answer:
eastern and southern Europe
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is to benefit colonial peoples
Explanation:
To benefit colonial is the right answer because Kipling was someone who proclaimed the idea that European colonial powers are taking on their back the obligation to illuminate Native people of the colonies. They are actually sacrificing according to Kipling, so they could help them evolve.
That is why other options are false.
Europeans have no benefit. They are "helping."
