Answer:
Ring v Arizona (2002)
Explanation:
On June 24, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Ring v. Arizona, ending the practice of having a judge, rather than a jury, decide the critical sentencing issues in a death penalty case. It is unclear, however, if the ruling will apply to all the defendants in all states with judge sentencing.
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.
The geographic area that was added to the United States by the Louisiana Purchase was “New France” property of France. It included areas in modern-day: Canadian Provinces Alberta and Saskatchewan, Louisiana, Kansas, Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Texas, New Mexico, North and South Dakota, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, and Minnesota.
Answer:
Cognitive
Explanation:
Cognitive approach of Schizophrenia
This approach simply uses a more complex psychological factors of humans faulty thought processes such as attention and perception in its explanation of what Schizophrenia is all about. These factors used are as a result of on specific brain mechanisms and schizophrenia develops in individuals where connections between these mechanisms controlling these cognitive functions are bad. This approach therefore suggest
s that Schizophrenia is the result of bad/faulty information processing.
There are two theories within the explanation
1. Frith theory,
2. Hemsley theory
The Frith's theory stated that sufferers of schizophrenia cannot filter information properly and too much unnecessary information is absorbed
. the theory explains auditory hallucinations and delusions.
Hemsley's stated that schizophrenia occurs as a result of disconnection between stored knowledge and sensory input and it explains all the hallucinations, disorganized thoughts and behavior.
I believe They would not be able to rebel against him without City walls . I may be incorrect.