Answer:
A secondary source is anything that describes, interprets, evaluates, or analyzes information from primary sources. Common examples include: 1. Books, articles and documentaries that synthesize information on a topic 2. Synopses and descriptions of artistic works 3. Encyclopedias and textbooks that summarize information and ideas 4. Reviews and essays that evaluate or interpret something When you cite a secondary source, it’s usually not to analyze it directly.
A primary source is anything that gives you direct evidence about the people, events, or phenomena that you are researching. Primary sources will usually be the main objects of your analysis. If you are researching the past, you cannot directly access it yourself, so you need primary sources that were produced at the time by participants or witnesses (e.g. letters, photographs, newspapers).
Explanation:
hope this helps you :)
Answer:
I say its true but i have no clue and if i get it wrong you can report me :)
Explanation:
Here is the full question:
<span>Struggling, unpublished writers are sure that publishers, who seek out and publish new authors, are nonexistent.
Find and correct the error in this sentence
The correct sentence should be without the second comma:
</span>Struggling, unpublished writers are sure that publishers who seek out and publish new authors are nonexistent.
publishers who seek out and publish new authors are nonexistent is a part of one clause that does not possess two different meaning, so it should not be separated by a comma.
'
