1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Advocard [28]
3 years ago
5

3. pleasseeeeeeeeeeee

History
1 answer:
marysya [2.9K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

America is named after Amerigo Vespucci.

Explanation:

It is named after this man because he was the explorer who set forth the revolutionary concepts that the lands that Christopher Columbus in 1492 were part of a separate continent.  

You might be interested in
How was Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini a theocracy?
Lady bird [3.3K]
It imposed strict religious laws, is the correct answer!

Hope I helped!!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
PART B: Which TWO pieces of evidence from the speech best support the answer to [RL.1]
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

there are many flowers among us that are... born to bloom unseen, and waste

their fragrance on the desert air." (Paragraph 11)

Explanation:

E.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the result of revival in the hearts of God's people?
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

i dont rly know exactly what ur trying to ask, but the hearts of god's people are joyful and always happy and never down because god is by their side

Explanation:

maybe that helped?

have a good dayyy

4 0
3 years ago
Why were class differences more pronounced in the South than in other regions? 1) The population was mostly noblemen and indentu
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer: their population was mostly noblemen and indentured servants.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the kingdom of Songhay, the successor state to Mali, begin to thrive economically?
    14·1 answer
  • Historic premillennialism believes... the kingdom of God is currently advancing the millennium is spiritual there will be a lite
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following did the five reformers who organized the Seneca Falls Convention have in common? 1 They came from states
    14·2 answers
  • The triple entente was made up of?
    15·1 answer
  • In the united state before the civic war, it was illegal to
    6·1 answer
  • What do Truman and Bush have in common?
    13·1 answer
  • What question could be asked using the 6W about the first black president <br> plz
    12·1 answer
  • Can someone help<br> Me please?
    11·1 answer
  • What effect did the creation of the Dominion of New England and the Navigation Acts have on the relationship between the British
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Greeks believe about the Oracle of Delphi?.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!