Are there multiple choices? if not id have to say because PLAIN has more a strategic plan to influence them
Well theres nothing really wrong with it. Maybe in certain places it can be questionable. But it's their bodies so whatever they want to do with it is their choice really.
I think that it would in one way be amazing if scientist could figure out a way how to clone humans, it really depends on your religious views and if you feel comfortable they're being more than one of the same person in this world. in a lot of ways is cloning experience could be a good in a lot of ways is cloning experience could be a good thing and a bad thing. for an example if your cline decides to shoot someone who is going to take the wrap? is this clone capable of making good decisions? Does this clone think like a regular functioning citizen?
I hope that helps.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C: "unconventional style".
Explanation:
The poem "A narrow fellow in the grass" by Emily Dickinson focuses in the life of wild animals. Dickinson tells the story of a man that had an encounter with a snake when he was a child. The way the author describes the snake in the poem is by using an unconventional style since she does not follow any particular rhythm or form. This can be noticed since the first four lines of the poem: "A narrow fellow in the grass; Occasionally rides; You may have met him—did you not; His notice sudden is;..."
