1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
15

How did employers respond to the growth of labor unions?

History
2 answers:
tangare [24]3 years ago
8 0

Since the XIX Century, the labor unions have been in constant evolution, in the beginning, were ignored almost by every single government entity.

This lack of support by the public power allowed to the employers an enormous advantage until recent times, the worker normally was exploited at the maximum way possible ( ridiculous long shifts, no healthcare benefits, etc).

In the XX and XXI Centuries, a lot of changes benefiting the laborers have been improving, however this doesn´t mean that the employers were too happy about it, once the labor unions started to grow and be heard with more attention, the power of the employers started to decrease, due to this, the labor unions gained power in a fast and effective way, gaining a considerable number of changes and benefits aiming to the workers.

The Employers tried to make alliances with the government, offering benefits in exchange, not accepting the multiple changes the laborers were asking, a lot of strikes happened, with pacific and sometimes violent protests were both sides were clearly affected, in order to finalize with all the public disorder, the government, employers and laborers get an agreement, where changes asked by the laborers were made, however a couple of regulations were made in order to guarantee the proper rights to the employers.

So based on this, the response by the employer since weren´t too friendly, they tried to respond and counter the unions, however we can say that the answer arrived late, when the unions were organized and supported by other entities, this way generating an obligated agreement for all the parts involved, in order to guarantee rights to the laborers.

Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
4 0

1. Lockout: Closing the factory to break a labor movement before it could get organized

2. Blacklists: Names of prounion workers circulated among employers

3. Yellow-dog contracts: Workers being told, as a condition for employment, that they must sign and agreement not to join a union

4. Calling in private guards or state militia

5. obtaining court injunctions against strikes

You might be interested in
In 1986, nations of the world began organizing economic protests against the country of South Africa. The United States, Japan,
svetlana [45]

Answer:D) South Africa continued its enforcement of a system of racial discrimination.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List seven weaknesses of the Articles according to the power point?<br><br> Helllppppp
devlian [24]
No court system
No chief executive
Laws needed approval from nine of the thirteen states
Congress did not have the power to draft the army
Amendments must be approved by thirteen states
Congress did not have the power to collect state debts owed to the federal government
8 0
4 years ago
Question 10 (1 point)
ivann1987 [24]
They did not enter ww1 because B). “the allies were winning”
6 0
3 years ago
1. In your opinion, what does the quote “the government that governs the least, governs the best” from paragraph 12 mean? Based
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

The phrase "who governs less governs better" implies that any government that stays out of establishing unnecessary, bureaucratic or restrictive regulations or standards regarding the exercise of political and economic freedoms of citizens and companies of the country will obtain a better result in your government than those governments that do otherwise. This, indeed, is true, given that the governments that interfere the least in the private economy are those that have the best economic results at the end of their mandates.

Regarding Hoover's phrase, it is fallacious. Capitalism does not produce greed, but allows anyone who strives and directs his efforts towards personal growth to do so, without having a socialist state that restricts that growth through the collection of excessive taxes or the confiscation of profits.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following advantages was held by the British at the beginning of the war?
ivann1987 [24]
The British Army had the advantage of having more ships and weapons than the Continental Army. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The sherman antitrust act of 1890 was passed primarily because of: the practices of various trusts in the railroad, steel, tobac
    8·1 answer
  • How many people died in the first six months of jamestown
    6·2 answers
  • Thomas Paine states that a new method of thinking has arisen." Why? What is the result of this new thinking?
    15·1 answer
  • Which was an area of agreement between Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis?
    14·2 answers
  • Tides are caused by the answer
    9·2 answers
  • Yesterday, December 7th, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy -- the United States of America was suddenly and
    15·1 answer
  • Despite the split in Christianity into numerous sects, what binds these religious sects together​
    7·2 answers
  • What up and coming Union general told the Confederates at Fort Donelson that no terms except for immediate and unconditional sur
    11·1 answer
  • This situation illustrates the use of
    15·1 answer
  • PLS HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!