Answer:
The doctrine of <u>stare decisis</u> requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case.
Explanation:
The answer is stare decisis because it is a principle that states that the same situations should be approach in the same form. According to this, a court has to adhere to the precedent that was established by another court as the decisions that have been taken by a court in the past turn into authority for similar issues that may arise later.
My guess would be A, but I'm not 100% sure so you should probs check that.
Issues in our current day include immigration, abortion rights, lgbtq rights, discrimination to women and poc, and the pandemic.
They got the recorsments they needed
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
